Planning review

After my engagement, I immediately started revising the planning. I made sure this new time model met all contractual requirements, including a closed network and a clear Critical Path Method (CPM). This not only provided an overview of key activities and milestones, but also insight into potential risks that could affect progress.

Monitoring and steering the schedule

After approval of the revised time model, I remained closely involved in the project to actively monitor progress. Through regular reporting and analysis, I ensured that bottlenecks were identified and addressed in a timely manner. This gave the team and the client assurance that the project remained on track, despite its complex nature and tight deadlines.

Improving change procedures

During the execution, it became clear that the handling of change requests could be more efficient. I improved the process by linking changes to both cost analysis- and planning scenarios. This allowed Kropman to communicate clearly and in a structured way with the client about the impact of changes, which contributed to better decision-making and smoother cooperation.